The Rural Services Network has considered these funds as part of it’s RURAL LENS series of work where we consider Government Publications and Inititiaves through a Rural Lens, to explore how well they consider rural areas and service delivery in rural areas.
We generally welcome the fact that proposals to target these funds have avoided falling back to the Index of Multiple Deprivation and have sought to measure some broader aspects of needs.
We welcome recent statements from the Communities Secretary, Robert Jenrick, reported in the Municipal Journal that “the Government wanted to help those that were ‘least adept’ at bidding for cash and to ‘redress historic levels of investment” and comments that “officials explained they considered rural areas to be less economically resilient. These are points the RSN has been making for many years.
ACROSS ALL FUNDS WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE UNEVENESS OF THE PLAYING FIELD IN WHAT ARE COMPETITIVE REGIMES.
The concerns relate to:
The Briefing Note ‘A rural perspective on government’s place-based funds’ (download here) considers each of the funds and the ways in which areas were determined for consideration.
The RSN is currently considering Build Back Better: Our Plan for Growth, which we understand takes over from the Industrial Strategy and will share this analysis in due course.
Sign up to our newsletter to receive all the latest news and updates.